> >This is with exim 4.34-10 and bogofilter 0.93.5-1. It certainly seems > >that with a fresh installation of these versions everything works as > >expected. > > > >I am now going to try the same suite of tests with version 0.93.3 and > >then attempt to upgrade to 0.93.5-1 as this is where Karl seemed to > >have a problem, moving from 0.93.3 to 0.93.5. I need to somehow track > >down an older version of the .deb.
I ran the same suite of tests with 0.93.0-1, ran some 46,000 emails through the thing with no problems. I then upgraded to bogofilter_0.93.3.1-1_i386.deb (the submitter sent me his .deb, so I used that one), deleted and recreated the DB files before running anything (as the bug submitter says he did). I ran another 30,000 emails through this version, doing some 3,000 per hour. No problems. I will now move from 0.93.3 to 0.93.5 in the same manner. However, it is increasingly clear that the chances for reproducing the original submitter's problems are approaching impossible. My reason is thus: 0.93.5 ran fine on a fresh install, with the same configuration as the submitter, it did not encounter database corruption. If I am destroying and rebuilding the database environment between 0.93.3 and 0.93.5 then I am doing nothing different than if I installed 0.93.5 fresh. The only difference is that I had the old version installed before. It seems highly likely that a permissions problem was the result of the corrupt DB. Especially in light of the fact that there has been no other person who has reported the same problem. micah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature