Re: Osamu Aoki 2016-05-05 <20160505141508.GB26421@goofy.local> > As for https://bugs.debian.org/541819 , can we check if it is still > problem. In short, Jakub raises issue for uscan and bts. > > As for uscan, I see the changelog: > | devscripts (2.13.5) unstable; urgency=low > | > | [ James McCoy ] > | ... > | * uscan: > | ... > | + Require LWP::Protocol::https instead of Crypt::SSLeay to access https > | sites. (Closes: #624317) > | ... > | -- James McCoy <james...@debian.org> Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:27:45 -0500 > LWP is provided by libwww-perl which is Artistic or GPL-1+. > > > As for bts, it uses Net::SMTP::SSL since 2008-06 and it is provided by > the libnet-smtp-ssl-perl package which is Artistic or GPL-1+. > > So as far as the direct dependency, both are OK even from Jakub's POV. > > Can anyone tip in to evaluate this situation?
I'd think if this issue wasn't important enough to get fixed in the past 7 years, we can just close it now. > PS: I am more or less with Christoph's point that the license > incompatibility for SSLeay is not an issue for perl programs at all. I've never heard anything to the contrary, but IANAL. Christoph
