Hi, Am Freitag, den 13.05.2016, 18:40 +0000 schrieb Jurica Stanojkovic: > There is a solution proposed on upstream. > https://github.com/bos/criterion/commit/0673606c70ba22234b8908a8f30e8 > ea588c6d776 > > With solution proposed on upstream I was able to build package > successfully on mips, mipsel, amd64 and i386.
thanks for testing. > However this solution is using assembly code on amd64 and not for > i386 and other archs. > > If you think that we could remove assembly code completely, > I am sending a patch that use proposed solution but does not include > assembly code. Why do you want to remove the (presumably faster) code on amd64? I don’t see a reason to diverge from upstream here. We should simply upgrade the package to 1.1.1.0 to get the fix. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim “nomeata” Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org • https://people.debian.org/~nomeata XMPP: nome...@joachim-breitner.de • GPG-Key: 0xF0FBF51F https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
