On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 13:27 +0100, Willi Mann wrote: > > Thanks for reporting this. The issue is quite simple: because the > > samba3 upgrade isn't part of the testsuite, I overlooked the changes I > > made to other js routines, and broke it. > > :-/ > > > I don't see any reason why we can't ship with some test data, and put > > this into 'make test', and I'll also fix the scripts. > > > > Thanks for the report! > > Where should I report samba 4 upstream bugs in the future? Is the debian > BTS OK for you or would you like them to go to > bugzilla.samba.org/samba-technical? I'm asking because there seem to be > some issues with remote registry editing using gregedit and regshell. > And I don't particulary like bugzilla.
Like it or otherwise, it remains the best way to ensure it doesn't get lost. But a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is always a good idea. I'm also on the debian BTS, and regularly on #samba-technical @ freenode Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
