Hi! [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-02-13 11:39 +0100]: > Sorry that you could not see my work in all its glory ;-)
Indeed, it would be nice to see this working. > >either get a totally black screen (the windows are still functional, > >though), or the qiv window including decorations remains on screen > >(although the process is already gone); the decorations are even still > >operable. > > > >Can you please try this under Gnome and update your patch? > > It's not easy to get Imlib/Gdk not interfere with the xlibs calls. After > I sent the initial patch to you and Adam (for upstream inclusion), Adam > informed me that he preferred a patch against the developer's version > 2.1-pre7 which I did (is in the BTS). I cleaned this patch up after > doing several stress tests, so before I do all the patching and > rewriting again it would be interesting whether you experience the same > problems with the latest patch (it's attached, patch against 2.1-pre7). I already saw the new patch and its behaviour is indeed no different than the 2.0 patch :-( However, I just noticed that qiv's original code is broken in the same way. Under Gnome (X.org 6.8.1 on PowerPC) it behaves exactly the same as with your patch; i. e. the background is not changed, instead the window is duplicated (including decorations) and persists even after qiv has exited. The window is still operable, redraws after restauration from minimization, but has no attached process any more. So this is not a fault of your patch, but rather a fault of qiv/imlib. Thus, if the patch works for you, I can as well apply it since it does not make things worse for me. Adam, any idea to this? Do you have the possibility to check this out under Gnome? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
