On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:31:18PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 06:25:03PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> > I've applied these in branch dom/jessie-imports-from-5.20.3 on top of
> > the jessie branch (which now has the fix for #821848 applied). I used
> > two separate merge commits (one for the functional stuff and one for the
> > docs).
> Grouping together
> fixes/5.20.3/preserve_record_separator.diff
> fixes/5.20.3/test_count_base_rs.diff
> more explicitly might be nice but that's just picking nits.
Another nit I forgot to mention here: some of the subjects are
RFC2049-encoded, for instance
,"DEBPKG:fixes/5.20.3/checking_sub_inwhat - http://bugs.debian.org/822336
=?UTF-8?q?[perl=20#123712]=20Don=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=84=A2t=20check?=
=?UTF-8?q?=20sub=5Finwhat?="
which looks very ugly. I'm not thrilled about making debian/gen-patchlevel
decode those (in sh+sed?!) at build time though. Probably we just need
to tolerate those.
(In fact, the above subject seems to have a double-encoding error
or something like that as both mutt and Encode::MIME::Header show me
[perl #123712] Don’t check sub_inwhat
So never mind...)
--
Niko
