Yes, here it works. Thanks for maintaining this package!
On 24/04/16 08:44, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Fenix (fenix...@gmail.com):Hi. I attach the previous patch cleaned of unfunctional cosmetic changes. As I said in my previous message, I maintain the complex anidation of the original conditional structure. It is ugly, but it works. Anyway, if you think it should be refactor, we can make it a bit more readable. So, I'm keeping from previuos patch (libusb1.0_fix.patch): 1) The elimination of a duplicate mark of block {} in the main for (this is cosmetic but is really ugly keep it. :)) 2) The changes for the else block in the conditional blocks (Functional change). 3) The changes that pass the new (for libusb1.0) endpoints directions of the device (functional change). In this, I change too the printed messages for a better understanding for verbose purpose (cosmetic but I think it's neccesary for good verbosity). If you have any question or suggestion, please, feel free to ask. As I said in my last message, could be a good idea that the original patcher of the port to libusb1.0 checks this patch. I suppose he is experience with libusb, and I could overlook something related with.I just uploaded -10 yesterday. Please let me know if it works OK now.
