Control: reopen -1 On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Aaron M. Ucko <u...@debian.org> wrote: > "László Böszörményi (GCS)" <g...@debian.org> writes: >> Upstream proposed ENOEXEC [1]. What's your opinion? I think it can >> mean similar in kFreeBSD context. > > Having reviewed the alternatives, I agree that that's the most reasonable > substitute. OK, will use it at every piece of ntfs-3g, the upstream patch doesn't cover all parts of the code. :( It's time for me to use some kFreeBSD porterbox. :-/
Cheers, Laszlo/GCS
