retitle 347964 xdx: package should not be native? thanks On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:04:57PM -0500, pryzbyj wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 07:03:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:07:13PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:01:26PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 11:48:17AM -0800, Debian Bug Tracking System > > > > wrote: > > > > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > > > > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.10 > > > > > > clone 346808 -1 > > > > > Bug#346808: xdx: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev > > > > > Bug 346808 cloned as bug 347964. > > > > > > > > retitle -1 xdx: nonpristine package > > > > > Bug#347964: xdx: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev > > > > > Changed Bug title. > > > > > > What in the world is this supposed to mean? > > > It doesn't have a .diff.gz, even though it doesn't appear to be > > > debian-specific at all. > > > > And why are you telling *me* this, instead of putting this information in > > the bug report? As of now, bug #347964 is still in the BTS as a bug with no > > information and a confusing title. > Nonpristine package is a confusing title? Oops, sorry; now I understand that it was.
-- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
