Hello Andreas, I dropped by #debian-python yesterday in order to clarify conformance to Python Policy 3.3 as suggested during a review on the ITP [1], and the conversation derived into a suggestion about revisiting the decision we made about the package names (excerpt from the log [2]):
Apr 12 17:56:45 <p1otr> there are 2 reported installations of python3-jellyfish on popcon - I'd rename the other python3-jellyfish now (module and binary package) and a then upload yours with python3-jellyfish name I'm wondering if you could share your thoughts on this issue and if you would be open to this change, even if it is quite a deviation from our envisaged solution? I'd be happy to move the discussion to other channels if needed, and again, thanks a lot for your patience on this issue. Best regards, [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807432#85 [2] http://paste.debian.net/432489 -- Diego M. Rodriguez 36B3 42A9 9F2F 2CFB F79B FF9B B6C4 B901 06BC E232
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
