On 2016-04-08 17:32:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: reassign -1 aptitude-doc-fr 0.7.8-1 > > [Full quote for aptitude maintainers]
It should also have been Cc'ed to the maintainers since the reassign comes too late. > On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 14:09 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Package: www.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > > > For option APT::AutoRemove::RecommendsImportant, > > > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/aptitude/ch02s05s05.en.html > > contains: > > As https://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals#aptitude indicates, the text > comes from the aptitude-doc packages, which are maintained by the > aptitude maintainers, not the web team. Reassigning... This is what I initially though, but apt-cache search only gives me the English version. Probably due to a problem with the mirror I had this morning when doing "apt-get update"... :( > > Description: If this option is true, then aptitude will not consider > > packages to be unused (and thus will not automatically remove them) > > as long as any installed package recommends them, even if > > APT::Install-Recommends is false. [...] > > > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/aptitude/ch02s05s05.fr.html > > contains: > > > > Description : Si cette option vaut true, aptitude ne considérera > > pas les paquets comme inutilisés (et donc ne les retirera pas > > automatiquement) aussi longtemps qu'un paquet installé les > > recommande, même si Aptitude::Recommends-Important a la valeur > > false. [...] > > > > i.e. the en version mentions APT::Install-Recommends while the fr > > version mentions Aptitude::Recommends-Important. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
