On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:09:45AM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal
> vips and nip2 were rebuilt via a binary NMU because of an unneeded > libdps1 dependency, and the newly built packages are present in the > archive. However, they are still listed as uninstallable at > http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] I am > assuming that the code that shows they are uninstallable is not > picking up the existence of the binary NMUs (maybe because of the new > version numbering convention?), but that's just a guess. > I'm sure there are several packages that can be used as examples of > this, but these two (vips and nip2) should be like this for another > week as I don't expect to reupload them this weekend. I might though > if I have some extra time to implement a better fix for the excess > dependency problem. Are you talking about this page?: http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=nip2 This is the only reference to uninstallability that I see, and it only applies to m68k, which is true... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
