Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Don, 12 Jan 2006, Steve Langasek wrote: >> However, gstreamer0.8 has a build-dependency on it, and I think we might >> miss that. Do you have a solution for gstreamer0.8? > > I could do the following: Take the sources from texlive (where > passivetex was excluded due to its existence in debian) and try to fix > the passivetex packages. It shouldn't be too complicated, but probably > would be a complete rewrite of the scripts/rules. > > Would this be ok for NMU?
It would also be a new upstream release, I guess (at least current upstream has a "tests" subdirectory, while the Debian package has "examples" instead). I don't think this would be good for an NMU, rather for a takeover. Which I wouldn't mind, if you want to take the task. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer
