On 1 April 2016 at 08:14, Sam Morris <s...@robots.org.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 07:58 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>
>> On 29 Mar 2016 04:03, "Felix Geyer" <fge...@debian.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Felipe,
>> >
>> > On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 20:56:48 -0300 Felipe Sateler  wrote:
>> > > I have uploaded an nmu. I have made the unit call out to the init
>> > > script, because it does more work than simply invoking ferm.
>> > >
>> > > Please find attached the debdiff
>> >
>> > I see two problems with your systemd service:
>> >
>> > 1) By default (CACHE=yes) the init script writes to /var/cache/ferm/ and
>> >    the systemd service is ordered Before=network-pre.target.
>> >    If /var is on a remote filesystem you have created a dependency cycle.
>> Hmm, correct. Ferm will have to start after the network. Sorry about that.
>
> It would be much better to drop the use of the caching feature. It's
> not even used by upstream's systemd unit. And I really don't want a
> firewall service that starts before the network is up.

You should open a new bug about that, as it is only tangentially
related to the issue of this bug (missing systemd counterpart for a
runlevel S script).

-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler

Reply via email to