Hi Gianfranco,

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 02:02:51PM +0000, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> >It would be nice if you could also provide it for Python 3 as a
> >separate package, so that it can be used in custom Python 3 scripts.
> >(Or alternatively, as the goal is to move to Python 3 anyway, ship
> >the Python 3 modules in the binwalk binary package.)
> 
> Impossible, lzo and others (runtime dependencies) arent python3 ready.
> 
> so this will require disabling some functionalities, I'm not sure it is worth 
> the effort.
> 
> What do you think?

Oh, I didn't think about the dependencies... That's unfortunate.
Then it's probably best to keep binwalk with Python 2 support for full
functionality. Though a python3-binwalk package would also be nice,
even if it means that some functionality has to be disabled (if it is
not too much work).

Thanks for considering it!

Kind regards,
  Reiner

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to