Le mercredi, 23 mars 2016, 23.14:59 Daniel Kahn Gillmor a écrit : > On Tue 2016-03-22 12:49:10 -0400, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > I've noticed that gpgv.exe fails its CI test > > (debian/tests/gpgv-win32) in version 1.4.20-4 (-3 and previous work > > fine): > > interesting, there was no change between -3 and -4 other than > re-adding the gpgv-udeb for constrained armel devices at tbm's > request (see #814027). > > I suspect this means that the toolchain changed in some significant > way between these releases.
I agree with this analyis; I've rebuilt gnupg in a clean chroot and the resulting gpgv.exe works, so we could just get the package rebuilt. > hm, right. I'm actually working on moving gpgv.exe over to the gnupg2 > packaging, so that we can get support for elliptic curve signatures > as well. I'll definitely test to ensure that it's properly > statically linked when i produce it from that source. Cool; saw the branch there, looking forward! > > (By the way, the CI seems to have never run successfully in the last > > months: https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/gnupg/unstable/amd64/ …) > > this appears to be because of uninstallable dependencies; the tests > can really only run on i386 systems or multiarch systems, right? is > wine32 available in amd64? As far as I understand it, wine32 is only available on i386, and the current way to install it on amd64 hosts is through multiarch. > I don't see any other architectures available at > https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/gnupg/unstable/, and i'm assuming > that the amd64 ci tester isn't multiarch. or am i misinterpreting > something? CC'ing Antonio: there's no way to setup multiarch within an autopkgtest, right ? -- Cheers, OdyX
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
