Le dimanche 20 mars 2016, 20:02:37 Michael Meskes a écrit : > > And as systemd-cron is the only user of timers in Debian; > > you're the first to notice; thanks ! > > Surprising, isn't it? Anyway, thanks for debugging.
fstrim did tried to ship a .timer but got immediatly struck down; I did filed this bug against policy, but that's like a message in a bottle at the sea: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770440 The long-term goal is that systemd-cron would just do nothing if a matching native timer is present; to allow for a smooth transition. https://github.com/systemd-cron/systemd-cron/blob/master/src/bin/systemd-crontab-generator.py#L494 CRONTAB_FILES = files('/etc/cron.d') for filename in CRONTAB_FILES: basename = os.path.basename(filename) if (os.path.exists('@unitdir@/%s.timer' % basename) or os.path.exists('/etc/systemd/system/%s.timer' % basename)): log(5, 'ignoring %s because native timer is present' % filename) continue > > There's well an upload pending (need a sponsor) > > to allow non-root to use crontab. > > I can do that. That would be great, I already had several nice sponsors; but it would be even better if it's someone who does use the package. I have DM rights, but this has to go through the NEW queue because of this change: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/systemd-cron.git/commit/?id=a57c0640c2c60f7c73c878c583fb314cba7a0506 -Architecture: all +Architecture: linux-any This C setgid helper has been enabled for almost two years on Arch + Gentoo; but having yet an other review of this security-sensitive code is always appreciated: https://github.com/systemd-cron/systemd-cron/blob/master/src/bin/crontab_setgid.c Another option would be to split-out vixie crontab out of src:cron as a shared facility; but I have no power there. > > No, it's broken here to since update to v229. > > Right. @systemd team, please include https://github.com/systemd/systemd > /pull/2695, seems to fix it for me. > > > > I completely and strongly disagree. Did you see my follow-up email, > > > it *never* executed my foo job. Ah, missed that one. > > > It may be only serious, but it definitely is not fit for a release. > > Then systemd 229 is not fit for release. > > Indeed you're right imo. This fix is not even list in upstream v230 changelog not really serious. Greets, Alexandre Detiste
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
