On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:06:24PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 15.03.2016 um 15:50 schrieb Santiago Vila: > > Excuse me, how is this unreproducible at all? > > It is neither reproducible on Debian's build servers nor on my system.
So if I report that "ls -l" segfaults would you tag the bug as unreproducible after checking that "ls --color" or "ls" alone do not segfault? You would have a very narrow definition of "unreproducible" then. For something to be considered unreproducible you should at least try the conditions under which the problem is *reported* to happen. If the report says "ls -l", you would try "ls -l". If the report says "400 MB of RAM", you would try "400 MB of RAM". Otherwise an unreproducible tag just means "I don't want to reproduce it", and not "We followed *all* the steps in the bug report one by one and the problem did not happen". Thanks.
