Control: severity -1 serious
Control: clone -1 -2 -3 -4
Control: reassign -2 gr-air-modes
Control: retitle -2 uses old libzmq1, should switch to libzmq5
Control: reassign -3 libzeromq-perl
Control: retitle -3 uses old libzmq1, should switch to libzmq5
Control: reassign -4 pdns
Control: retitle -4 uses old libzmq1, should switch to libzmq5
On 14/03/16 20:12, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
Hi Emilio,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
<po...@debian.org> wrote:
We have zeromq and zeromq3. I'm wondering if we should drop the former.
It depends. It's still working and used more than zeromq3. See popcon
for example. The former while being old, counts 1.404 and the latter a
minor 31 only.
Yes, for libzmq5, because you just changed the name and people haven't upgraded
yet (including stable users). But compare libzmq1 to libzmq3:
https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=libzmq1
https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=libzmq3
There's only a couple of rdeps left (not counting a couple of perl modules
with no rdeps), which would need to get migrated to zeromq3 if they wanted
to be released with stretch.
I don't know those Perl packages if they have an active upstream or
not. But you are right, those should use the new, still being
developed version.
Yes. Bumping this to RC so we don't release stretch with it, and opening bugs
for the rdeps.
Cheers,
Emilio
