tags 811595 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks

Martin Michlmayr pisze:
> 
>> sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.67.0 (26 Dec 2015) on dl580gen9-02.hlinux
> ...
>> g++ -DWITH_UCL -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 
>> -DWITH_LZMA=0x922 -I/usr/include/lzma -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong 
>> -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall -W -Wcast-align -Wcast-qual 
>> -Wpointer-arith -Wshadow -Wwrite-strings -Werror -o p_w16ne.o -c p_w16ne.cpp
>> In file included from compress_lzma.cpp:237:0:
>> /usr/include/lzma/LzmaEnc.c: In function 'UInt32 GetOptimum(CLzmaEnc*, 
>> UInt32, UInt32*)':
>> /usr/include/lzma/LzmaEnc.c:1350:9: warning: statement is indented as if it 
>> were guarded by... [-Wmisleading-indentation]

I cannot reproduce it, the package compiles fine with gcc-6

g++-6 -DWITH_UCL -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-DWITH_LZMA=0x922 -I/usr/include/lzma -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong
-Wformat -Werror=format-security -o p_w16ne.o -c p_w16ne.cpp
g++-6 -DWITH_UCL -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-DWITH_LZMA=0x922 -I/usr/include/lzma -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong
-Wformat -Werror=format-security -o p_w32pe.o -c p_w32pe.cpp
...

dpkg-deb: building package 'upx-ucl-dbgsym' in
'../upx-ucl-dbgsym_3.91-1_i386.deb'.
dpkg-deb: building package 'upx-ucl' in '../upx-ucl_3.91-1_i386.deb'.
 dpkg-genchanges -b >../upx-ucl_3.91-1_i386.changes
dpkg-genchanges: warning: package upx-ucl-dbgsym listed in files list
but not in control info
dpkg-genchanges: binary-only upload (no source code included)


> LC_ALL=C dpkg -l gcc-6
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name                 Version         Architecture    Description
+++-====================-===============-===============-==============================================
ii  gcc-6                6-20160228-1    i386            GNU C compiler

Are you still able to reproduce it by yourself?

Regards,
robert

Reply via email to