On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:26:35PM +0100, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > Anyway when I have two reports, one saying that matroxfb does not work on > 2.6.11 and another that it does work, I'm lost. As since 2.6.9 or so > matroxfb uses only readl()/writel() to access all hardware, without any > optimizations, 64bitness of hardware should not matter, only endianness > problems should in the drawing code (matroxfb_1bpp_imageblit) - readl & > writel should still work same way.
Its not the same card though, one is a G450, and the other a G200. Furthermoe Tom used a 2.6.11.6 kernel, while Roberto probably used a much earlier version. Not sure if there are still two different matroxfb in 2.6.11 as they used to be though ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
