Control: reassign -1 openntpd

Hello Martin-Éric Racine.

Thanks for your quick followup.

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 09:46:27PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> 2016-02-21 20:14 GMT+02:00 Andreas Henriksson <[email protected]>:
> > Hello Martin-Éric Racine.
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 05:17:30PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> >> Package: util-linux
> >> Version: 2.27.1-3
> >> Followup-For: Bug #812199
> >>
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA256
> >>
> >> Reassigned from 'openntpd'
> >>
> >> Since 'hwclock --systohc' no longer is run at reboot/shutdown, some NTP 
> >> implementations fail at performing the initial synchronization because the 
> >> delta between RTC and system time is to big.
> >
> > The only thing I can suggest is that you switch to a working NTP
> > implementation because normally hwclock would not be involved at
> > all in updating the RTC after NTP sync.
> 
> Nobody said that any NTP daemon would run hwclock.

If hwclock isn't even executed then you can't possibly have found a bug
in hwclock.

> 
> >> It also seems that something sets the system time to the wrong offset to 
> >> UTC. Typically, after reboot, the system time is set to what would be UTC 
> >> time rather than the expected correct local time. what would instead be 
> >> expected is for system tiem to be an offset to UTC and for the RTC to be 
> >> presumed to run at UTC time.
> >
> > Sounds bad but you leave me with nothing to go on so impossible to
> > do anything about.... moreinfo, unreproducible.
> 
> Here's a question: why isn't the current system time saved to RTC upon
> reboot/shutdown anymore?

This isn't a free support forum, it's a bug tracking system.

Here's some free advice however, see CONFIG_RTC_SYSTOHC
If googling the matter doesn't provide all the other revelant
information feel free to hire someone to lecture you on the matter.

Reassigning back to openntpd given that util-linux isn't even involved
(and unlikely it's a kernel bug since atleast other ntp implementations
definitely works).

Regards,
Andreas Henriksson

Reply via email to