On 2016-02-21 Andreas Metzler <ametz...@bebt.de> wrote: > On 2016-02-20 Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: > [...] >> - m4_esyscmd([git rev-parse --short HEAD | tr -d '\n\r'])) >> + m4_esyscmd([printf %x $(wc -l < debian/changelog)])) > [...]
> Why don't we simply hardcode this as 1, 2 or 42 instead? Having changing > builds without source changes (just becuse the lenght of > debian/changelog increased) seems wrong to me. [...] Hello, I have now merged/selectively pulled the necessary changes on the experimental branch. Builds-for-me. Could you take a look? What is still open is whether we need to ship the la files at all, and if we do whether they really should have non-empty dep-libs. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
