Rene Engelhard wrote: > > This is what the bug I referenced in my last mail wants. And I don't > want to do that (in any case, why not just an "else"?). It still is > too premature for that afaik. And no, before you ask; Ubuntu doesn't > ship it either, they just build it and let the build fail...
You decide. Sincerely, it's not as bad as you said. I did a tour of it yesterday and my desktop didn't burst into fire. :) I found few problems but nothing really lethal until now (I admit I didn't try very deep but I was expecting much worst). I am starting to think that the badness of OpenOffice in 64bits was just a rumor (as nobody really tried out). Just for the record, you can get it here: # OpenOffice 2.0 (64bits) deb ftp://ftp-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/linux/oo64/ ./ PS: Yes, an "else" would be better. Regards -- Emmanuel Fleury In fact, in Linux we did try C++ once already, back in 1992. It sucks. Trust me - writing kernel code in C++ is a BLOODY STUPID IDEA. -- Linus Torvalds -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
