On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 00:00 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 21:22 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote: > > Re: Svante Signell 2016-02-18 <1455809556.5852.62.ca...@gmail.com> > > > ?p=libqb > > > > Does that make any sense to you? > > Hi, found the problem. The updated patch unfortunately removed the > check for sem_timedwait, the updated patch is as attached (without) > - sem_timedwait semtimedop \ > + semtimedop \
No, that was not the correct solution. For some, yet unknown reason, the test code returns with an error, even for systems with a working sem_timedwait. An updated test case will follow soon. Thank you for your patience.
