Le 19/02/2016 01:19, Paul Wise a écrit : > Thanks to everyone for the explanation. I think I understand the situation > now. > > On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 10:42 -0500, Mike Connor wrote: > >> The one point I'll clarify is that this isn't even something I'd call >> an exception. We have always sought to permit and enable >> modifications that do not negatively impact users (in terms of >> security/privacy, user expectations of Firefox >> stability/behaviour/compatibility, etc). Other distros have been >> following this process for more than a decade, so it's definitely not >> a special case for Debian. I'm thrilled that we're finally making >> this step forward with Debian. If other distros have questions or >> concerns, I'm happy to provide answers. > Could the Mozilla employees in this thread please get the trademark > policy updated so that what Debian and other distributions are doing is > explicitly allowed by the policy? As it stands, theoretically "any > modification to the Mozilla product" ... "will require our permission > if you want to use the Mozilla Marks" and Linux distros are thus > relying on Mozilla ignoring their lack of trademark license. > I agree that it would be better to explicit that in the trademark policy. As you can imagine (just like in Debian), this kind of changes can take time. Until then, I believe that Mike Connor's comment and my bug report (note that I used my @mozilla.com email address and not @debian.org) should be enough for the Debian ftpmasters.
Sylvestre
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
