On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:41:02PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> Hi Julian,
>
> could you please cite those "lawyers and people" or explain their arguments?
> (Not that citing a lawyer neccessarily means anything, but just stating some
> lawyers think something is not even enough to think about removing a package
> from the archive.)
I have not done a survey but I don't know anyone disagreeing. Several
distributions
were taken down for bundling Nvidia drivers AFAIK, also:
(1) The Conservancy has an active GPL Compliance Project For Linux Developers
and
already supports Christoph's lawsuit against VMWare.
(2) We lead with a bad example by engaging in this dark-grey to black area
activities
Legal issues prevent me from saying more, but somebody else might want
to step forward.
> And the ZFS situation is not comparable because that one is about a
> incompatability of two different licences…
In both cases, code of a GPL-incompatible license is linked to GPLed code.
Whether the incompatible license is free or non-free does not make
any difference at all.
--
Debian Developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev
When replying, only quote what is necessary, and write each reply
directly below the part(s) it pertains to (`inline'). Thank you.
