(Sending this again to 778...@bugs.debian.org, not -done.)
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Bug#778240: tracker.debian.org has much worse
display clarity"):
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > The black tet is now legible, thanks. The biggest remaining problem
> > for me is that the links are still in a very pale shade of blue.
>
> Ok, changed the blue of the links to the one you proposed.
Thanks!
> > I still prefer some other aspects of the old style: For example, the
> > font still seems narrower and taller than the old pts; I find the
> > wider shorter version somewhat more legible. And the inter-item gap
> > in the "news" section is still larger, which I find a waste of
> > valueable space. But these are more clearly matters of taste and I
> > won't fight over them.
>
> OK, then I'll close this bug as I don't want to tighten it further
Thanks for listening to our feedback, and for your work on the new
tracker. I'll start using it now :-).
Not really important now, but:
> and the default font size is something that is easily changed in the
> browser.
I did just want to point out that this is not really relevant. The
relevant question is "how much information can be presented readably
on a particular size and quality of screen".
Obviously the user can (and will) increase or decrease the font size
to try to maximise this measure. But a less-readable font or layout
means that the font has to be made larger, worsening the
information/legibility tradeoff.
Thanks,
Ian.
