Le lundi, 1 février 2016, 12.00:53 Yuri D'Elia a écrit :
> On 01/02/16 11:58, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> The double recommend/suggests is a bit wonky.
> >> Maybe you should recommend on (liblouis-bin | liblouisutdml-bin).
> >>
> >> I don't know what's the difference in braille support between
> >> liblouis-bin and liblouisutdml-bin, but if the package is
> >> recommended I would go for the better one only.
> >
> > The better one is liblouisutdml-bin, which provides better document
> > parsing than the basic liblouis-bin.
> >
> > The issue is that ubuntu does not have liblouisutdml-bin in main,
> > only in universe.
>
> Ah, I see now.
> Then I would simply recommend on (liblouisutdml-bin | liblouis-bin).
Till, Samuel; does this look like a good-enough compromise ?
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -76,12 +76,11 @@ Depends: ${shlibs:Depends},
bc,
ghostscript (>= 9.02~),
liblouis-data,
- liblouis-bin,
imagemagick (>= 6.4~),
poppler-utils
-Recommends: colord
+Recommends: colord,
+ liblouisutdml-bin | liblouis-bin,
Suggests: foomatic-db-compressed-ppds | foomatic-db,
- liblouisutdml-bin,
antiword,
docx2txt
Conflicts: ghostscript-cups,
--
Cheers,
OdyX
