Am Freitag, den 12.02.2016, 20:42 +0100 schrieb Stephen Kitt: > I agree. In addition, the E1M8 license isn't DFSG-free so we couldn't > add it to freedoom anyway...
Right. I think we were never going to add it to the freedoom package. But since its mere download size doesn't justify its own package, I think adding it to doom-wad is the most reasonable thing to do. > > There is one caveat that would need to be made explicit: the new E1M8 breaks Well, let's say it requires Boom (or at least a limit-removing port). If we do not add further integration, e.g. a desktop file or similar, I don't think there is anything we would need to change to the doom-wad package's dependencies. > (Fabian, do you plan on packaging crispy-doom?) Na, I don't think so. We already have the most faithful Vanilla and Boom ports in Debian and we even have Doomsday for those who like graphical bling at the cost of compatibility. I am not sure how far Gloome or GPLGZDoom are, but they could be worth considering in the future. Crispy Doom, on the other hand, is really just my hobby project. A niche port for which I cannot guarantee how much time I will be able to spend on in the short term. Cheers, Fabian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
