Thank you. I'm not sure what the etiquette is here -- I am fine with this proposed change (we have taken the patch upstream but have not released a new version of Mosh or an updated package yet). I'm happy to let your NMU go through as-is, but if you would like me to do a 1.2.5-2 upload that cherry-picks this patch, also fine.
-Keith On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Laurent Bigonville <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: tags 803253 + pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for mosh (versioned as 1.2.5-1.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. > > Regards. > diff -Nru mosh-1.2.5/debian/changelog mosh-1.2.5/debian/changelog > --- mosh-1.2.5/debian/changelog 2015-07-23 08:45:07.000000000 +0200 > +++ mosh-1.2.5/debian/changelog 2016-01-31 16:19:12.000000000 +0100 > @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ > +mosh (1.2.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium > + > + * Non-maintainer upload. > + * debian/mosh.maintscript: Fix /etc/bash_completion.d/mosh removal, > thanks > + to for the patch Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> (Closes: #803253) > + > + -- Laurent Bigonville <bi...@debian.org> Sun, 31 Jan 2016 16:19:09 > +0100 > + > mosh (1.2.5-1) unstable; urgency=low > > * Version 1.2.5 released. > diff -Nru mosh-1.2.5/debian/mosh.maintscript > mosh-1.2.5/debian/mosh.maintscript > --- mosh-1.2.5/debian/mosh.maintscript 2015-07-23 08:45:07.000000000 +0200 > +++ mosh-1.2.5/debian/mosh.maintscript 2016-01-31 16:14:18.000000000 +0100 > @@ -1 +1 @@ > -rm_conffile /etc/bash_completion.d/mosh 1.2.5~ -- "$@" > +rm_conffile /etc/bash_completion.d/mosh 1.2.5~ >
