Control: tags -1 wontfix Control: severity -1 wishlist Sounds like a plan!
Lun, 25 ian. 2016, 01:24, Aaron M. Ucko <u...@debian.org> a scris: > Michael Crusoe <michael.cru...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Upstream points out that the sort of data one would use with this program > > basically means that running it on 32bit platforms won't work out due to > > the 4GB limitation. > > That's fair, though I'm not aware of a way to specify "only 64-bit > architectures" in the Architecture: field short of explicitly listing > them, so perhaps it's better to mark this bug as wontfix and let 32-bit > builds keep failing -- snap-aligner's source and its build dependencies > are all at least fairly lightweight. > > > Seems about right to me, so I'm not going to put further effort into > 32bit > > compat, but I will accept patches if you figure it out. > > With my proposed logic, snap-aligner compiles without errors on i386. > However, it then encounters two test-suite failures, both in EventTest: > > EventTest: > - many waiters: [FAILED] > *variable was 4, expected 16: many started 16 > > (tests/EventTest.cpp:40) > - single waiters: [FAILED] > *variable was 0, expected 1: single started 1 > > (tests/EventTest.cpp:40) > > 7 / 9 tests passed. > > Also, there are some warnings along the way about mismatched printf > specifiers. > > BTW, never mind what I said about kfreebsd-i386, which failed in the > same fashion as i386 and x32, not as kfreebsd-amd64. > > -- > Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) > http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | > http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu > -- Michael R. Crusoe CWL Community Engineer cru...@ucdavis.edu <mcru...@msu.edu> Common Workflow Language project University of California, Davis https://impactstory.org/MichaelRCrusoe http://twitter.com/biocrusoe
