Hi again, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> (2016-01-11): > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> (2015-06-14): > > gtk+ 3.0 now depends on libepoxy, so we need a libepoxy udeb. > > The attached patch seems to do the trick. With it I was able to rebuild > gtk+3.0 so that its udeb gets the proper dependency, and to build a > netboot-gtk mini.iso Debian Installer image with the resulting udebs. > > I'm getting a black screen at start-up though, which might just be > insufficient or incorrect porting in the cdebconf gtk frontend when > built against gtk3. This will be discussed on debian-boot@: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2016/01/msg00214.html
There was an issue in cdebconf indeed, see report at: https://lists.debian.org/20160111032435.gd8...@mraw.org Next issue: It seems we need libGL.so.1 so that something built against gtk3 has a chance of being displayed (through libepoxy presumably, given its purpose/description) → now getting ENOENT and a retry loop, which is a different kind of black screen in d-i. If that was at all possible, it would be nice if we could avoid pulling mesa inside d-i, and maybe disable libepoxy in src:gtk+3.0 for its udeb. libepoxy doesn't seem to be optional there though… If that can't be done, sticking with gtk2 might be an option… :( Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
