On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 03:25:53PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Package: valgrind
> Version: 1:3.11.0-1
> Tags: upstream
> 
> Seems like gcc 5 is doing something funky
> (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21):
> 
> ==3674==
> ==3674== HEAP SUMMARY:
> ==3674==     in use at exit: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
> ==3674==   total heap usage: 306,736 allocs, 306,735 frees, 22,184,464
> bytes allocated
> ==3674==
> ==3674== 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1
> ==3674==    at 0x4C28C4F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
> ==3674==    by 0x72ED11F: pool (eh_alloc.cc:117)
> ==3674==    by 0x72ED11F: __static_initialization_and_destruction_0
> (eh_alloc.cc:244)
> ==3674==    by 0x72ED11F: _GLOBAL__sub_I_eh_alloc.cc (eh_alloc.cc:307)
> ==3674==    by 0x400EA09: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:78)
> ==3674==    by 0x400EAF2: call_init (dl-init.c:36)
> ==3674==    by 0x400EAF2: _dl_init (dl-init.c:126)
> ==3674==    by 0x40011C9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.19.so)
> ==3674==    by 0x1: ???
> ==3674==    by 0xFFF00049A: ???
> ==3674==    by 0xFFF0004A9: ???
> ==3674==
> ==3674== LEAK SUMMARY:
> ==3674==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
> ==3674==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
> ==3674==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
> ==3674==    still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks
> ==3674==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks

This is a false positive and should be suppressed. It may take me some time to
look into this though, so if you want to provide a patch (to the debian.supp
file) feel free to do so.

Thanks

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to