On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 03:25:53PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Package: valgrind > Version: 1:3.11.0-1 > Tags: upstream > > Seems like gcc 5 is doing something funky > (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21): > > ==3674== > ==3674== HEAP SUMMARY: > ==3674== in use at exit: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks > ==3674== total heap usage: 306,736 allocs, 306,735 frees, 22,184,464 > bytes allocated > ==3674== > ==3674== 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 1 > ==3674== at 0x4C28C4F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299) > ==3674== by 0x72ED11F: pool (eh_alloc.cc:117) > ==3674== by 0x72ED11F: __static_initialization_and_destruction_0 > (eh_alloc.cc:244) > ==3674== by 0x72ED11F: _GLOBAL__sub_I_eh_alloc.cc (eh_alloc.cc:307) > ==3674== by 0x400EA09: call_init.part.0 (dl-init.c:78) > ==3674== by 0x400EAF2: call_init (dl-init.c:36) > ==3674== by 0x400EAF2: _dl_init (dl-init.c:126) > ==3674== by 0x40011C9: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.19.so) > ==3674== by 0x1: ??? > ==3674== by 0xFFF00049A: ??? > ==3674== by 0xFFF0004A9: ??? > ==3674== > ==3674== LEAK SUMMARY: > ==3674== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks > ==3674== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks > ==3674== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks > ==3674== still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks > ==3674== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
This is a false positive and should be suppressed. It may take me some time to look into this though, so if you want to provide a patch (to the debian.supp file) feel free to do so. Thanks
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature