Hi, On 2016-01-08 23:24, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > Maybe we should switch from libusb0.1 to libusb-compat-0.1 before > dropping it completly (which may take some time, since the changed > API must be supported upstream). > > http://www.libusb.org/wiki/libusb-compat-0.1
Yes, there is even bug #731424 opened for it. I personally don't really see the point of changing one library for another, except maybe introducing some bugs in the switch. I remember there were some issues with this compat library, but they might have been fixed in the meantime. Also it hasn't seen any change in the last 3 years, and not much development besides bug fixes in the last 6 years. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
