On 01/08/2016 09:40 AM, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 08/01/2016 06:58, Jens Reyer wrote: >> Upstream recently changed the buildsystem, since then the wine manpage >> isn't available any more on 64-bit. > > Has this been reported with upstream? I don't think arch-dependent > manpages are a good idea.
It was done on purpose and knowingly. I read about it on the upstream mailing list, before seeing the consequences here. Since the manpages contain arch specific paths I see this as the right solution generally. The problem is that we can't really make use of the "correct" upstream buildsystem in Debian, because we ship wrapper scripts in path, without really knowing if the 32- or the 64-bit version gets installed, or if they even get co-installed (then the wrapper scripts now default to 32-bit wine and 64-bit wineserver). However I tend to ignore that as a real problem in the documentation, see previous mails. I even decided for now to build the wine64-binary-loader manpage from the unchanged wine-binary-loader manpage-source. Greets jre
