Hi, On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 02:25:31PM +0000, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Hello, > > On 5 January 2016 at 11:04, Ralf Treinen <trei...@free.fr> wrote: > > Package: libboost-date-time1.55.0 > > Version: 1.55.0+dfsg-4 > > Severity: serious > > User: trei...@debian.org > > Usertags: edos-uninstallable > > > > Hi, libboost-date-time1.55.0 is not installable in sid on any of the > > architectures amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-amd64, > > kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x. This is the case > > since 2015-08-01. > > > > The reason is that it depends on libstdc++6, however libstdc++6 (5.3.1-5) > > declares a Breaks relation with libboost-date-time1.55.0. > > > > This is not a bug =) boost1.55 was removed from testing, and should be > removed everywhere else too. > > The current boost in both testing and unstable is boost1.58, which is > compiled with c++'11 abi and should be installable.
well, it still is a bug, you are just saying that you are not going to fix it (which is of course OK since it is obsolete). > Given that it's no longer installable can boost1.55 be requested to be > removed from unstable? I think so, but you should look out for packages that depend on boost1.55 packages [1]. -Ralf. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
