Package: zorp Version: 3.9.5-4 Severity: normal
-- System Information: Debian Release: 8.2 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages zorp depends on: ii adduser 3.113+nmu3 ii libc6 2.21-6 ii libglib2.0-0 2.42.1-1 ii libssl1.0.0 1.0.1k-3+deb8u1 ii libzorp3.9 3.9.5-4 ii libzorpll3.9-1 3.9.4.1-3+b1 ii python 2.7.9-1 ii python-dns 2.3.6-3 ii python-kzorp 3.9.5-4 ii python-openssl 0.15.1-2 ii python-radix 0.5-3 ii python-support 1.0.15 zorp recommends no packages. Versions of packages zorp suggests: pn zorp-doc <none> ii zorp-modules 3.9.5-4 -- no debconf information I see it as important for usual end-user to have a GUI for their protection. Having no or not relevant GUI will prevent usual users coming to linux and do something more then typing ... It is even not clear from the package description, if it has an GUI or not. I assumed it from a linux mag series, which shows an GUI. The screenshot in Synaptic is empty.