On Jan 04, Nathan Scott <nath...@debian.org> wrote: > Sorry, I'm juggling many balls & this has been off the radar for a long > time. Help is *always* very welcome, thanks! I think also nothing else > (packages) depends on libdm anymore - used to be xfsdump? - so perhaps it > should be removed entirely from the archive. Indeed, no package in the archive depends on it and it has been removed from testing due to a FTBFS bug. I checked and neither xfsdump nor xfsprogs depend on it since at least oldoldstable. If you do not think that this library is still useful for modern software then I recommend asking for its removal.
-- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
