Hi Denis!
* Denis Briand <deb...@denis-briand.fr>, 2015-11-01, 11:02:
Lintian found into qelectrotech copyright file a
dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique.
The same license is used in several paragraphs, but with different
copyright and for different files.
The copyright file in question looks like this:
| Files: ico/oxygen-icons/* ...
| Copyright: 2009, Nuno Pinheiro
| License: LGPL-2.1
| This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
| ...
|
| Files: ico/16x16/circle.png ...
| Copyright: 2009, Everaldo Coelho
| License: LGPL-2.1
| This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
| ...
I believe that Lintian correctly complains about multiple different
definitions of the LGPL-2.1 license. What you should do it to put
LGPL-2.1 into a separate stand-alone license paragraph:
| Files: ico/oxygen-icons/* ...
| Copyright: 2009, Nuno Pinheiro
| License: LGPL-2.1
|
| Files: ico/16x16/circle.png ...
| Copyright: 2009, Everaldo Coelho
| License: LGPL-2.1
|
| License: LGPL-2.1
| This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
| ...
Alternatively, you could merge the two Files paragraphs:
| Files: ico/oxygen-icons/* ...
| Copyright:
| 2009, Nuno Pinheiro
| 2009, Everaldo Coelho
| License: LGPL-2.1
| This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
| ...
--
Jakub Wilk
