On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 18:32:43 +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:37:39PM +0530, Bhuvan Krishna wrote: > > I didn't get the point of copyright. You suggested that I inform > > upstream that MIT is kind of ambiguous, Can you give some pointers to > > initiate a discuss with the upstream? > TBH, I don't have any particular pointer. > Do anybody knows something more useful about this?
https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ has a short note: "There are many versions of the MIT license. Please use Expat instead, when it matches." with a link pointing at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License#Various_versions Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - https://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
