On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Diederik de Haas <didi.deb...@cknow.org> wrote: > I'm adding my info to this bug report as I would have choosen the same > title, even though the steps/behavior aren't the same.
they are actually different situations. > Earlier today I have reported bug #805132 > (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=805132) with title > "glx-alternative-nvidia:amd64 installs update-glx:armhf as dependency". > As you can see by the title the arch where a package came from is > critical, but especially that info was missing from the Package list > section. The relevant part of that bug report (for this bug): > > Versions of packages glx-alternative-nvidia depends on: > ii glx-alternative-mesa 0.7.1 > ii glx-diversions 0.7.1 > ii update-glx 0.7.1 > > The maintainer of that package was able to confirm this behavior. that list is the package dependencies as defined by $ dpkg --status glx-alternative-nvidia | grep Depends Depends: update-glx (= 0.7.1), glx-diversions (= 0.7.1), glx-alternative-mesa which are the ones reportbug enlist. -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi
