-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi:
On 28/12/15 19:05, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 06:00:46PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> I realized this part of the story at finalizing stage when I was testing >> my material with pbuilder (Sid): lintian emmitted a lot of warnings about >> this automatic package: I have fixed them (and other related stuff) by >> introducing by hand the dbg package. If I remember well the lintian message >> sent me to a Debian website: the new behaviour of the Debian tool chain >> was cited in an ad hoc way; it sounds like it might be done by hand. > > Old versions of lintian might emit some warnings, but as of what is > currently in sid (2.5.39.1, but also 2.5.39 (that is also in -bpo) is > good enough for this) I play with the bpo version on my every day box, but, since debhelp is the Jessie version, no extra/hidden -dbgsym is generated. there should be no messages at all about automatic > built packages (at least, messages relevant to the automatically built > stuff) Indeed: adding a missing -g option in an obscure Makefile.in (last century material) resolved the issue: some upstream packages are full of surprises, especially the one written at the beginning of the C (C89) age or/and GNU age by programmer not educated as programmer (for good and simple reasons). Thanks, Jerome > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWgYw7AAoJEIC/w4IMSybjiMAH/jV3jq9wNf68TE9Gx1Dyjpch A5ISBu/2dLw0uPfCjlUDfZjxLTN4luVEgcLdoIIZTKJ264Iuu//Y94YxPXkvr2qP DUHJRoG94ynAWB+VUKzvRW2Amjv9CkM4lpDgbFE8VnGNg+S9R2Qtl12tmD3tuyWJ tsODsgHryGG0m03YLtU4VqLi4Be/0eWM0mtYRDDVkzaDOPcGVlJgv+kSnPsHpVwz Xz+jkZNciZZyAyQ9bc0C/5jcQrwTpSLp9lVHjC67sq9CYibQCzGlNN0+QyqA/PnU bjwiZ2zv7oQdE8DKEemFyDTgIYdr5nh027ouvv9wFK7mUcssPwCJ5ucPunDDv9g= =hUGL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
