On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 06:06:26PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Andy Chittenden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > After much toing and froing, our domain admin managed to create me an > > account and samba's now working. Now for the other 45 machines ... :-)
> Which leaves us with an interesting thing to think about? > Is the bug worth investigating, given that it occurs with a setting > that is not deeply supported? > My opinion: I'm not sure that the Samba Team considers > "security=server" as completely obsolete and, on the other hand, we > seem to have valid debug output so it might be worth sending the whole > stuff to upstream Bugzilla. Comments? Sure, it's worth forwarding upstream. I'll continue encouraging people not to use security=server, though. :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
