-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 12/18/2015 10:02 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Not yet. I have postponed it to the weekend. I was busy with fixing > up ghc on sparc64 and was also a bit overwhelmed by the Perl > transition.
So, I am now doing testbuilds and I just noticed that ghc was already removed from unstable for armel which has now made the whole situation more complicated and requires manual building because the build dependencies can no longer be automatically satisfied. Joachim, why exactly did you have to request for a removal of ghc? We are still around one year away from freeze and I don't see any real need to act urgently, so that ghc-7.10.3 migrates to testing. But, alas, ghc on armel is gone now and I have to build ghc:armel manually now. I guess, I will have to upload the package directly for armel then. *sigh* Adrian - -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWdG9JAAoJEHQmOzf1tfkTHewQAKKyoum4AoZ8ojwaCq5jfc/r d9F7EWKpbNyRWAa7dLySI2L3O0TIfnDAXV18UnFrQuQ9Ney+NFefnYNhqITB/5Dy AADKk5nVU/Ajpl69yMerHlIn47k15s7Dha+Yz9rBC9XGPwiR2wsr6aCspBnqedbH AscxnOmE6OBMYV/M74y2Sncs68Xb6U1gTOCM4XdSiEci04s+fNJwxe62ji/+PL71 LQ79Kl4Qm+0jPRVm3EEuW9VNtGK/Sh+9jgmkUKhKzw6MgYYuwpraHlMU1UjgDjEM d3wOWm293egrDcAWGIW9NkLlztgOjvNRrEJbgQ1Jt2deqGqF8TwcFjSvEGOuoPx5 28erJ27WAtkmwxG80kNfRfNIm/0FTWZMBsPydOp79XvgKHYozakWNbXobqaC0RUP 3JcnZE4sHRC5btBayjq6EVF90b27oM0C6mJQ703VuXnD5kaKkmkYzVGY/xDnq88T H5arTZf5rVT9MXfrQZMj2/Xz23kDPTxB/Utb97cS3EU3lqDl2pr8t3pCOqjggdcB 4PZvTDUB13RV1Dqv2L8u3y5nNY5fSkkjJGRRP2KVCRNWPvgnzIwvCHSm2ZHRir9b tCCfvKyvWxhonRJrooUmLF6WC7WHPRZThgJpve2g5nSNIcbO6W9hsZh75TzNLuYc LjCb6XmibiaH9YKmTCEX =E81m -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
