Hi, UDD has the correct info, as you can check with: select * from upstream where source ='mini-buildd';
udd-dehs seems to use mole.watch, according to the code. I would recommend switching to udd's upstream table, given it's also used for DMD. So problems would be easier to notice. Lucas On 18/12/15 at 10:12 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Control: reassign -1 qa.debian.org > Control: retitle -1 udd-dehs: Report wrong new upstream version for a native > package > Control: user qa.debian....@packages.debian.org > Control: usertag -1 + udd > Control: affects -1 tracker.debian.org > > Hello Lucas, > > is there any chance that you can fix the problem below? I don't know > if you just need to drop old data or if you have to teach the tool to ignore > old watch files... > > On Sat, 06 Dec 2014, Bart Martens wrote: > > The same problem is on https://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mini-buildd.html . > > > > The output of https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/udd-dehs contains this: > > > > | debian-mangled-uversion: 0.8.20 > > | debian-uversion: 0.8.20 > > | messages: Not downloading as --package was used. Use --download to > > force downloading. > > | package: mini-buildd > > | status: Newer version available > > | upstream-url: > > http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/mini-buildd/mini-buildd_1.0.0~alpha.8.tar.gz > > | upstream-version: 1.0.0~alpha.8 > > > > And mini-buildd 1.0.5 does not contain a debian/watch file (which is good!). > > > > Current versions of mini-buildd in Debian are: > > > > oldstable 0.8.15+nmu1 > > testing 1.0.5 > > unstable 1.0.5 > > > > So the problem seems to be that UDD contains outdated information. > > -- > Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer > > Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html > Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/ >
