Hello Georges, On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 04:30:02PM +0100, Georges Khaznadar wrote: > Hi Jonas, > > thank you for the bugreport, it will be fixed in my next release for > Debian. (I hardwired the libraries' names into the script which builds a > new source package) > > By the way, this script chunk: > > PRETTY_REPOS=$(curl https://api.github.com/orgs/KiCad/repos?per_page=2000 2> > /dev/null | sed -r 's:.+ "full_name".*"KiCad/(.+\.pretty)",:\1:p;d') > > ... does not yeld the repository names for TO_SOT_Packages_THT.pretty > and TO_SOT_Packages_SMD.pretty
something must happen on the Github site, I can find the missed libraries with your curl snippet from above. $ curl https://api.github.com/orgs/KiCad/repos?per_page=2000 2> /dev/null | sed -r 's:.+ "full_name".*"KiCad/(.+\.pretty)",:\1:p;d' | grep TO_ TO_SOT_Packages_THT.pretty TO_SOT_Packages_SMD.pretty > Please can you file a bugreport to upstream people about it? something > is broken at github's level: for example, the URL > https://github.com/KiCad/TO_SOT_Packages_SMD.pretty does exist, but > there is no link to it from the page https://github.com/KiCad and > similar (https://github.com/KiCad?page=2 , ...) The particular repositories are now visible on the Github site. > If that can be fixed, my script will be able to harvest every .pretty > library without declaring its name explicitely. As now there was version 4.0.1 released in the between times, would it be possible to package this recent version? Regards Carsten PS: I noticed the ROM because of trouble with needed Boost dependcies.
