On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:15:03 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> Dominic Hargreaves <d...@earth.li> writes:
> >>> If not then perhaps that should just be dropped from the > >>> redhat-cluster package ASAP [...] -- of course, since redhat-cluster > >>> FTBFS, this would have to be done by the release team manually > >>> removing (just) libccs-perl from testing. Is this feasible? > > Not really. At least not AFAIK, and it'd be hackish and ugly if it was > possible. > It'd be nice if the FTBFS got fixed instead. If it's too difficult to make it > build with GCC 5 (I guess it isn't, but...) then as a temporary workaround you > could make it build with GCC 4.9. The build doesn't even get that far, it fails due to the corosync changes, cf. #804590. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - https://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Bettina Wegner: Das Hinterhaus oder ....
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
