On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:06 PM, David Fries wrote: > I'm sorry, yes I should have been more specific, I measured it now at > 138 pixels, which is a tenth of a window for me at home or a twentieth > at work.
138 pixels seems like an incredibly arbitrary choice. For HD monitors those pixels will consume far less physical space than on a low res monitor. Anyway, that sounds like a bad implementation choice, and you should try to convince upstream that is so. > This is a regression of expected UI > behavior on Linux making it inconsistent with every other program I'm > aware of. Will Debian carry simple patches that help make the user > experience more cohesive? I agree that jumpy behavior like this is not good. I haven't ruled out applying the patch, but would prefer to see an upstream solution can be achieved first. Best wishes, Mike