Control: tags -1 + pending
2012-01-04 07:32 jida...@jidanni.org:
"DH" == Daniel Hartwig <mand...@gmail.com> writes:
DH> The separation between the syntax and descriptive parts may make this
DH> difficult to read.
Probably need to bang it home again in the text explicitly.
Banged it home thus:
If one or more <pattern>s are present (in addition to the mandatory
last argument, which should be a valid <package> name), then aptitude
will begin its search at these patterns. That is, the first package in
the chain it prints to explain why <package> is or is not installed,
will be a package matching the pattern in question.
from the old:
If one or more <pattern>s are present, then aptitude will begin its
search at these patterns; that is, the first package in the chain it
prints will be a package matching the pattern in question.
Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com>
